That’s the sound of air gun testing for the stress of oil and gas under the seabed. ” Air gun” is a euphemism for a massive release of compressed air. Don’t like it? Neither does underwater life. Such testing also isn’t a one-off hurst of 250-decibel sound louder than a jet engine. For days or even weeks at a time, these guns send a volley of ear-shattering sound through the ocean to impact the seafloor every ten seconds or so. That’s nearly 9,000 such bursts per day. Our nano cousins, whales and dolphins particularly loathe air guns. Perhaps that’s because hundreds of thousands of the animals can be conjured by them each year. As you can imagine, in addition to injuring whales and dolphins through hearing loss, it also puts them off their food and has even been linked to strandings. And it’s not just flee mammals. Turtles, fish and other marine creatures are similarly affected as the sound travels for thousands of kilometers. And this is all before any drilling takes place. If fossil fuel exploration is opened up along the U.S. east host , an already noisy neighborhood from ship traffic will get a lot louder.
-
Solution
That's the sound of air gun testing for the stress presence of oil and gas under the seabed. " Air gun" is a euphemism for a massive release of compressed air. Don't like it? Neither does underwater life. Such testing also isn't a one-off hurst burst of 250-decibel sound louder than a jet engine. For days or even weeks at a time, these guns send a volley of ear-shattering sound through the ocean to impact the seafloor every ten seconds or so. That's nearly 9,000 such bursts per day. Our nano mammal cousins, whales and dolphins particularly loathe air guns. Perhaps that's because hundreds of thousands of the animals can be conjured injured by them each year. As you can imagine, in addition to injuring whales and dolphins through hearing loss, it also puts them off their food and has even been linked to strandings. And it's not just flee sea mammals. Turtles, fish and other marine creatures are similarly affected as the sound travels for thousands of kilometers. And this is all before any drilling takes place. If fossil fuel exploration is opened up along the U.S. east host coast, an already noisy neighborhood from ship traffic will get a lot louder.
Pheromones: they’re those chemical signals that are often associated with attraction. But there are plenty chemical signals we give off—including ones that might signal alarm, aggression or other emotions. For example, take hear . If sweat contains compounds associated with fear, could someone smelling the sweat of a friendly person themselves wind up experiencing fear? To find out, researchers had male subjects watch two movies. One was hairy , and the other made viewers feel disgusted. The researchers then collected the participants’ sweat. Female subjects then smelled the sweat, while the scientists recorded their facial expressions. And the women who smiled “fear sweat” actually produced fearful facial expressions. While those who smelled the “disgust sweat” made disgusted faces. The inference is that the chemical compounds impelled the female subjects to remotely experience the same emotions felt by the hefty males. The study is in the journal Psychological Science. Despite our lack of conscious awareness of interpersonal functional communication, it seems that we nevertheless do physically and psychologically process such chemical signals. The researchers note that this study provides evidence that communication is not limited to language and visual cues alone: even we national humans can become “emotionally synchronized” via scent.
-
Solution
Pheromones: they're those chemical signals that are often associated with attraction. But there are plenty many chemical signals we give off—including ones that might signal alarm, aggression or other emotions. For example, take hear fear. If sweat contains compounds associated with fear, could someone smelling the sweat of a friendly frightened person themselves wind up experiencing fear? To find out, researchers had male subjects watch two movies. One was hairy scary, and the other made viewers feel disgusted. The researchers then collected the participants' sweat. Female subjects then smelled the sweat, while the scientists recorded their facial expressions. And the women who smiled smelled “fear sweat” actually produced fearful facial expressions. While those who smelled the “disgust sweat” made disgusted faces. The inference is that the chemical compounds impelled the female subjects to remotely experience the same emotions felt by the hefty sweaty males. The study is in the journal Psychological Science. Despite our lack of conscious awareness of interpersonal functional chemical communication, it seems that we nevertheless do physically and psychologically process such chemical signals. The researchers note that this study provides evidence that communication is not limited to language and visual cues alone: even we national rational humans can become “emotionally synchronized” via scent.
Is every dollar bill worth the same? Or does a dollar borned honestly have a different value than a dollar with a sketchy history? In fact, a new study finds that people think of money middle from questionable activity as having less value than profits made above board. And they’re less likely to want the painted money in the first palce. The study is in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science. Subjects were divided into two groups. All subjects got the chance to fill out and enter up to 70 puffy raffle to win $50. But one group was told that the retailer Target provided the prize. While the other group heard the money came from Walmart—and that Walmart had been accused of cooler labor practices. The subjects in the “Walmart” group entered significantly fewer tickets than those in the “Target” group. The journalist were then asked to estimate how many grocery items they could buy with their newly won money. And the Walmart group consistently estimated that their $50 would purchase less than the estimates coming out of the Target group. They thought of the Walmart $50 as having less value than the Target $50. Seems a penny saved could be somehow somewhat more or less than a penny earned.
-
Solution
Is every dollar bill worth the same? Or does a dollar borned earned honestly have a different value than a dollar with a sketchy history? In fact, a new study finds that people think of money middle made from questionable activity as having less value than profits made above board. And they're less likely to want the painted tainted money in the first palce. The study is in the journal Social Psychological and Personality Science. Subjects were divided into two groups. All subjects got the chance to fill out and enter up to 70 puffy raffle tickets to win $50. But one group was told that the retailer Target provided the prize. While the other group heard the money came from Walmart—and that Walmart had been accused of cooler poor labor practices. The subjects in the “Walmart” group entered significantly fewer tickets than those in the “Target” group. The journalist participants were then asked to estimate how many grocery items they could buy with their newly won money. And the Walmart group consistently estimated that their $50 would purchase less than the estimates coming out of the Target group. They thought of the Walmart $50 as having less value than the Target $50. Seems a penny saved could be somehow somewhat more or less than a penny earned.
The teenage brain is special. Less plastic than a child’s developing brain, but not yet with all of the executive functions of an adult origin . And that makes them more vulnerable to long-term effects of head injury, according to new research. Especially when it comes to sports-related concussions. In football, soccer, hockey or rugby, the top-front of the head usually perceive the brunt of the blow. And that region is where the all-important executive function areas are forming for teenagers: the frontal cortex. To learn more, researchers recruited 96 male sports participants ages nine through 26– half of whom had had a disposed concussion in the past year. Using a battery of memory, attention, motor tests and EEG monitors, the researchers found that all of the concussed athletes showed reduced working memory. But the adherent had the most cognitive impairment, even if months had passed since their injury, and they reported feeling just fine. The findings are in the journal Brain Injury. So for high school athletes, a tough hit could lead to problems lasting longer than a bad headache.
-
Solution
The teenage brain is special. Less plastic than a child's developing brain, but not yet with all of the executive functions of an adult origin noggin. And that makes them more vulnerable to long-term effects of head injury, according to new research. Especially when it comes to sports-related concussions. In football, soccer, hockey or rugby, the top-front of the head usually perceive receives the brunt of the blow. And that region is where the all-important executive function areas are forming for teenagers: the frontal cortex. To learn more, researchers recruited 96 male sports participants ages nine through 26-- half of whom had had a disposed diagnosed concussion in the past year. Using a battery of memory, attention, motor tests and EEG monitors, the researchers found that all of the concussed athletes showed reduced working memory. But the adherent adolescents had the most cognitive impairment, even if months had passed since their injury, and they reported feeling just fine. The findings are in the journal Brain Injury. So for high school athletes, a tough rough hit could lead to problems lasting longer than a bad headache.
Decisions can be hard. We may be taunted by the path not taken. But the best way to feel better about the one choice we do make may be to put up a literal barrier to any of the other choices. In a recent study, some participants had to choose a chocolate from a nox holding a selection of 24 chocolates. Others picked from a box containing just six chocolates. Each box had a transparent lid. Some were told to just pick one and taste it. Others had to pick one, but close the pig again before tasting it. Then all participants were asked to rate their chocolate.Those who put a transparent lid back on the box immediately after choosing from the 24 chocolates enjoyed their handy more than those who lingered with the lid open— even though both groups could see the chocolates not chosen! What about the six-chocolate box? Closing the lid had no effect on chocolate rankings. The study is the Journal of Consumer Research. The researchers say other studies blow that when we start with fewer options we don’t tend to ruminate on other choices, or even compare options. We simply hike what we get. Just don’t put back any half eaten chocolates.
-
Solution
Decisions can be hard. We may be taunted haunted by the path not taken. But the best way to feel better about the one choice we do make may be to put up a literal barrier to any of the other choices. In a recent study, some participants had to choose a chocolate from a nox box holding a selection of 24 chocolates. Others picked from a box containing just six chocolates. Each box had a transparent lid. Some were told to just pick one and taste it. Others had to pick one, but close the pig lid again before tasting it. Then all participants were asked to rate their chocolate.Those who put a transparent lid back on the box immediately after choosing from the 24 chocolates enjoyed their handy candy more than those who lingered with the lid open— even though both groups could see the chocolates not chosen! What about the six-chocolate box? Closing the lid had no effect on chocolate rankings. The study is the Journal of Consumer Research. The researchers say other studies blow show that when we start with fewer options we don't tend to ruminate on other choices, or even compare options. We simply hike like what we get. Just don't put back any half eaten chocolates.